Kidman won't sell baby photos
Categories: Newborns, Pregnancy & birth, Money & work, Celeb kids, Life & style, Celeb parenting, Rumors, In the news, Media, That's entertainment
Nicole Kidman may be debuting pics of her new baby soon, but if she does so, it won't be for cash. The Oscar winner and her country music star husband, Keith Urban, recently welcomed Sunday Rose into the world. According to reports, they've been debating about whether to share their joy in picture format.
According to The Sydney Morning Herald, if they do release pics, it won't be for a lot of money. In fact, the Australian paper is reporting, if pictures are released it will be for free.
As we all know, the Jolie-Pitt twins pictures will be worth between $15 and $20 million. The money has reportedly been earmarked for charity. Hollywood stars have had a long tradition of selling pictures of their children to publications like People and OK Magazine for hefty sums. Nice to see the Kidman Urban tribe isn't willing to share their joy only if there's payment involved.
Recent Posts
- Secrets of a healthy lunch (8/29/2008)
- Sick of the staycation? (8/29/2008)
- Disposable diaper saves toddler's life (8/29/2008)
- Dad teaches kid how to assemble rifle in 15 seconds (8/29/2008)
- Heated seats not so good for wanna-be dads (8/29/2008)
Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jan Bay 7-15-2008 @ 5:57PM
"Nice to see the Kidman Urban tribe isn't willing to share their joy only if there's payment involved."
Is this statement to say that Nicole Kidman Urban and Keith Urban will not ACCEPT money for the pictures of the baby or that there has not been much money OFFERED from the newspapers or magazines? There is a difference.
What's wrong with celebrities taking money from the corporations and funneling into a worthy charity if they are going to make the pictures public anyway?
Jan from http://www.unique-baby-gear-ideas.com/
Reply
Lisa 7-16-2008 @ 10:01AM
I don't see a problem with selling photos. They only have value because the idiot-masses care to see them. Those same people will be throwing money at mag publishers to purchase the issue with the photos whether the publisher pays for the photos or not.
Reply
Ku 7-27-2008 @ 12:40AM
If celebrities want to sell their baby photos for charity I am all for it. Honestly, if I could avoid my baby have his photo in the paper I would but I understand why they do it. It's to keep the paparazzi at bay. Hey if they want to do it for free, good for them is all I have to say. It's a might refreshing... hoping it will last that is.
Reply